Streaming giant company Netflix experienced another loss of 970,000 subscribers in the second quarter of 2022. Previously Netflix lost more than 200,000 subscribers in the first quarter of 2022. However, this figure is better than what Netflix predicted as it thought it would lose two million subscribers. According to TechCrunch, this number is the largest in the history of Netflix.

Indeed, in the past year, Netflix has faced a significant threat from new players in the streaming industry, such as Disney+, HBO Max, and Paramount Plus. Last quarter, Paramount Plus subscribers grew by nearly 40 million, HBO and HBO Max added 13 million new subscribers, while Disney+ subscribers added 8 million.

Not just losing subscribers recently, Netflix has changed its business strategy to deal with the difficult months ahead. In May and June, Netflix laid off 450 employees.

This incident began with a case of sharing profiles that were widely traded cheaply and not in the same house. Of course, this purchase did not occur on the official Netflix platform. This certainly does not have a good impact on Netflix.

Of course, Disney+ takes advantage of this momentum to attract customers to use their platform. How does Disney+ overtake the top leader in the market?

How Disney+ Could Overtake Netflix?

The good news came from Disney+, which immediately took over the international market and shifted the pioneer of digital streaming. Disney+ Hotstar (the India and Southeast Asia Disney+ subsidiary) recorded an increase in new subscribers by 22%, or as much as 7.9 million. This was revealed through Walt Disney’s financial statements for the first quarter of 2022. This increase in paid subscribers means Disney+ currently has 87.6 million subscribers, consisting of 4.4 million in America and 43.2 million international subscribers.

Not only that, Disney+ has been named the leader of the Subscription Video On Demand platform in Southeast Asia. By recording the most subscriber growth in Indonesia, reaching 5 million subscribers. This figure is about 28% of 17.4 million Indonesians who subscribe to Subscription Video On Demand. Its competitor Netflix only has 906,000 subscribers until 2020.

This Disney+ strategy is revealed by their original content, which partners with Marvel. Marvel movies are stored on their video-on-demand list with low subscription fees. Disney+ offers affordable subscription fees starting from IDR 39,000 per month or IDR 199,000 per year; customers can already enjoy Disney+ content. In addition, Disney+ also attracts partners in cooperation with internet provider providers.

That way, Disney+ can become a leader in Asia and get international customers. Establishing a strategy of cooperation with other brands is an effective marketing strategy for Disney+.

But what about Netflix? Will the next year be the leader of the streaming industry? Let’s discuss.

Is There Any Chance for Netflix to Retake the Top Position?

Now Netflix is ​​planning Netflix to also launch a new subscription package at a lower price but with advertisements. In its letter to shareholders, Netflix said the package would launch early next year.

But not all Netflix content will be available on ad-supported plans due to content licensing agreement issues. Netflix Co-CEO and Chief Content Officer Ted Sarandos said the company will deliver some content, but not all of it will be available when the package launches.

In addition, Netflix plans to fight users who share accounts with other users who don’t live in the same house. Netflix has started experimenting by testing the ‘add a home’ feature, where users will be charged an additional $3 if they want to share an account with users who don’t live in the same household.

Take the Golden View

Of course, Netflix’s customer loss was reported in international media, and the public also wondered why this pioneer could suffer such a significant loss. This can certainly be an evaluation of Big companies and startups to be more careful, and there is always a plan for recovery from critical times in business.

The post Netflix Lost Badly to Disney+ This Year appeared first on SiteProNews.

What is Facebook’s Plan for the Metaverse?

Mark Zuckerberg describes it as a “virtual environment” that you can step into. It’s an endless world of interconnected virtual communities, where people can meet, work, and play, using virtual reality headsets, augmented reality glasses, smartphone apps, or other devices.

The virtual environment created by Facebook can also do things like go to virtual concerts, travel online, view or create art and virtually try on or buy clothes.

Facebook has launched a meeting software for enterprises, called Horizon Workrooms, for use with its Oculus VR headsets. Create a metaverse experience of seeing coworkers in a video call box, employees can join them in a virtual office, and users will be able to move between virtual worlds created by different companies.

The Benefits and Drawbacks of Changing Facebook’s Name to Meta

In the development of the virtual environment built by Facebook and at the same time changing the company name to Meta, there are pros and cons. Here are the results of my analysis of the pros and cons:

The Pros of Rebranding Facebook to Meta

The Metaverse Environment Is Centrally Designed

Many existing metaverse platforms are based on blockchain technology which makes central control impossible. Dave Carr, communications lead at the organization that runs the virtual world Decentraland, said: “In this virtual world, people are using cryptocurrencies to buy land and other digital objects in the form of non-fungible tokens (NFTs).”

By combining blockchain technology and NFT crypto, it will make it easier for people to sell limited edition digital objects like NFT, display them in their digital space, and even resell them to the next person safely as quoted by Reuters Carr also described Decentraland’s metaverse environment as decentralized and Facebook’s plans are likely centered.

Virtual Reality Is Getting More Popular

The reaction from early metaverse adopters said the inclusion of Facebook could increase interest in the virtual world concept in general, attract more users and support the development of multiple virtual worlds.

Tristan Littlefield, the co-founder of the NFT company nft42 and a metaverse user since 2018, said his first reaction to Facebook’s announcement was that a giant like Facebook is stepping in and just throwing billions of dollars away, could be a positive thing “because of the emergence of new people it will bring into space.

Support the Development of Multiple Virtual Worlds

This technology will also incorporate other aspects of online life such as shopping and social media. According to “The Metaverse” Document the right way to break through consumers’ ignorance of VR is to deliver what the users expect and want.

The document also states, that envision users developing virtual advertisements through a digital world, which is filled with virtual goods that can be purchased. In addition, there will also be virtual people who get married and spend time in this space called the ‘Metaverse’.

According to an analyst who follows new technologies, Victoria Petrock, “this is the next evolution of connectivity where it all starts to come together in a seamless doppelganger universe, so you live your virtual life the same way you live your physical life”.

The Cons of Rebranding Facebook to Meta

Increased Scrutiny of Facebook from the US Congress

Facebook is also facing increased scrutiny from the US Congress and the media after a former employee, Frances Haugen, leaked documents or reports dubbed the “Facebook Papers” revealing various problems on Facebook that were ignored and not resolved properly.

Internal research also reportedly shows that Facebook is aware of drug and human trafficking issues on its platform but has failed to take adequate action to address the issues.

To add to the growing story surrounding Facebook, a new report from The New York Times now claims that an internal study commissioned by the company found the “Like” button on the platform to be causing “stress and anxiety” among many users.

Meta Has Been Registered as a Trademark in The United States

The Guardian reported that the change of Facebook’s name to Meta was challenged by Meta PCs Arizona, a computer startup for gamers based in Arizona, USA.

Zack Shutt, the co-founder of Meta PCs, said the company was listed in November 2020, and their team was not aware of Facebook’s plans to use Meta for rebranding, until last week when Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced it.

He revealed that Meta had been registered as a trademark of his company’s products, and received an official certificate in August 2021, or about two months before the change of Facebook’s name to Meta.

Zack Shutt and another Meta PC founder, Joe Darger, said they would not sell the Meta name, for less than $20 million, if Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg tried to acquire the name.

Changing the Company Name Does Not Necessarily Increase Trust

Forrester’s Vice President and Research Director, Mike Proulx said that if Meta doesn’t take its (privacy and security) issues seriously, no doubt the same problem will come to Metaverse as well.

From the results of Forrester’s research which surveyed 745 people in the US, Canada, and the UK, the majority (75 percent) thought that changing the company name did not necessarily increase trust in Facebook.

One of the lawmakers from New York, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez argues that Meta has the potential to be a bad threat to state institutions and also its users.

Summary

Will the pros outweigh the cons for the user? It’s hard to say when so much of what we know about the metaverse is speculative. It’s a big job, and we need the tech giants to take control because they’re the only ones with enough resources to bring the metaverse to life. As for how it turned out, only time will tell.

The post Pros & Cons of Rebranding Facebook to Meta appeared first on SiteProNews.